NOTES
- Introductions: name, where you spend most of your time, your interests
- Michael Mazzara
- Ally Sprague
- Max Bennett
- Robbie Kanarek
- Archi Duxus
- Nico Szerman
- Context: MW to set the scene for what this project is about + introduce session goals
- Notes
- Problem
- In a complex society, people cannot see how they meaningfully fit into civilization’s project
- The higher rungs of Maslow’s hierarchy are difficult to solve…what is a modern interpretation of the base rungs?
- Symptom of failing institutions: suicide rates increasing in developed world
- Extreme liberalism has created a “hedonistic” society built around immediate fulfillment of short-term “needs”
- As technology automates more tasks, people naturally get placed into more trivial roles
- Politics leaves room to be beholden to the tyranny of the minority
- Solution Design
- In a market economy, the success of the proposal depends on the proposer getting users to pay more than the proposer has to pay to create the thing (profit!)
- Deciding what is good is a collective task
- If the costs of climate change were levied immediately, people would react. It’s the cost being spread over the long-term that lets people ignore it.
- Starting Point
- Giving people challenges to work on
- Going after spaces where the current systems are ineffective: FDA (hospital approval system…how hospitals set budgets or make patient decisions), prediction markets
- Tie to a metric like cost per kwh
- In small groups we naturally help each other and we don’t need money…when you get to a large group and people don’t know each other and you view others as anonymous, people lose empathy and there’s a tragedy of the commons. To solve that governments “force” people to clean the commons through tax.
- Enable homeless to be producer, as opposed to viewing them exclusively as consumers. Look at switzerland example of how they tackles homelessness
- Build a prediction market wrapper for evaluating something like is “XYZ FDA approval going to get approved or not” … in hospitals there’s a board that decides if a patient gets the experimental drug…the decision is based on the probability that the drug goes wrong / what ways can it go wrong and what are the consequences of it going wrong. Give the board the outcome distribution from the prediction market.
- Misc
SESSION GOALS
- Verify the problem: our economy and other institutions are losing their ability to effectively guide us down meaningful paths.
- belief in god, trust in government, and finding meaning through work are all on the decline.
- Money can be “earned” by completing tasks that aren’t actually valuable (i.e. optimizing ads platforms or damaging the planet or working on redundant projects or creating financial products derivative of a lie)
- Producing cigarettes, alcohol
- Money can be “printed” without the creation of value (i.e. what the U.S. Federal Reserve effectively does by controlling money supply)
- Money can be held and not invested into value creation (i.e. wealth inequality).
- Verify the solution design: a new system for proposing meaningful behavior and evaluating the proposal
- A more efficient and dynamic proposal mechanism along with a more accurate evaluation mechanism
- Explore a starting point: could we have a system where a new proposal is submitted digitally > turned into an NFT > a mix of voting, market demand, and expert analysis evaluate the proposal > the idea grows into a real project or goes dormant based on that evaluation
- Which category of ideas to start with? Geography-specific? Industry specific? Philanthropic? Problem based?
PROMPTS
Verify The Problem
Explore the current state of our coordinating symbols / institutions.
- How are our institutions doing? Do our economies, religions, and governments steer the ship of civilization and our individual lives effectively?
- Are our symbols degrading and losing efficacy?
- Does the pursuit of money lead to a personally fulfilling and collectively meaningful life?
- Does god’s will or a nation’s laws provide provide fulfilling guidance?